For you Valentine’s Day refuseniks, it’s Cavalli’s birthday. And for me, it’s time to go back to Lully for a recently-unearthed opera by that gangrenous bastard released on recording earlier last year following its (implausible) 2010 world premiere. Sigh. Thanks, Christoph Rousset for being all Baroquely geek-chic and photographing so damn well.
Actually, my admiration for Lully was heightened last fall when I finally got to see a Lully opera live and in person. In fact, Les Arts Florissants’s revival of Atys at BAM was one of the best things I’ve seen in the nearly 10 years I’ve lived in New York (don’t believe me? Read my rave review here). Like most operas, and especially operas further back on the chronological scale, a strong case is best made by a titanium-caliber orchestra, conductor and cast, and Christie—unsurprisingly—brought that in spades, along with a production that de-moth-balled what could be a pretty stale story.
In tandem with his Talens Lyriques, Rousset’s account of Lully’s Bellérophon (1679) is another such performance to crack open the hard shell of antiquated Baroque styles and make the music seem vitally relevant. In fact, I was struck by how many references and presentiments floated around in this score. The “Fear No Danger” chorus in Purcell’s Dido and Aeneas planting roots in the chorus of Amazons and Act III’s ensemble number “Assez des pleurs” (the latter a striking calm after a considerable vocal storm). The entry of the Egyptians sounds like something straight out of the rustic bandes of Vivaldi’s Four Seasons, especially the final movement of “Spring,” full of pastoral flavor in its use of instruments.
A chorus in the Prologue is equally exquisite, for its motet-like construction that sounds like something out of JS Bach’s sketchbooks—more Germanic in its execution than French, as you can see from the rhythmic unison contrasted with varying vocal and orchestral lines below (I spliced this together from two images taken from the score, pardon the skewedness of the lines. It’s a seamless melody).

For a composer given to Versailles-style excess, that’s some stark, stunning simplicity right there. The resulting sound is borderline beatific, entirely appropriate to Lully’s church—the opera.
But one of the most interesting connections that wouldn’t leave my head was the runaway overture, a prelude whose B-section rhythmically resembles Beethoven’s Große fugue, Op. 133. It’s considered to be one of Beethoven’s more daring works, derided upon its premiere as “repellent,” “incomprehensible, like Chinese” and “a confusion of Babel.” Stravinsky later called it “an absolutely contemporary piece of music that will be contemporary forever.”
They sound similar, but they’re not written that way. There are few audio samples I can pull of this overture (obviously), and some interpretations on YouTube play it as straight eighth notes, as written out in the score (see below in a much cleaner copy): Continue reading →